Incidence of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome after Distal Radius Fracture

PURPOSE: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) can present following distal radius fracture (DRF) and may progress to require carpal tunnel release (CTR). The primary aim of this study was to determine the incidence of CTS within 6 months of a DRF and the rate of CTR in this population. METHODS: We used the PearlDiver national insurance database to determine the incidence of CTS after DRF. Patients were identified by International Classification of Diseases-10 codes, and treatment modalities for DRF and CTS were determined by respective Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients with less than 6 months of follow-up, bilateral DRF, or preexisting CTS were excluded. Patient demographic characteristics were recorded. The time from DRF diagnosis to CTS diagnosis and CTR was determined. A multivariable analysis was performed to determine the differences between patients who underwent a CTR compared with those who were treated conservatively. RESULTS: We identified 23,733 patients (6,015 men; 17,718 women) who sustained a DRF. Of these patients, 79.1% were treated nonsurgically and 20.9% underwent surgical fixation. In total, 9.2% (N = 2,179) were diagnosed with CTS in their ipsilateral extremity within 6 months of sustaining the DRF. Of the patients whose DRF was treated nonsurgically, 6.3% (N = 1,198) developed CTS and 2.9% (N = 546) required CTR. Of those patients whose DRF was treated surgically, 19.8% (N = 981) developed CTS and 13.3% (N = 661) required CTR. Of those patients with symptoms severe enough to warrant CTR, 18.5% required a second surgical intervention for the CTR. CONCLUSIONS: Distal radius fractures severe enough to require surgical fixation are associated with a higher incidence of perioperative CTS. Accordingly, careful evaluation for and counseling on CTS during surgical fixation may decrease the chance of a second surgery. We have identified a cohort of patients with DRFs who may benefit from prophylactic CTR. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic IV

Incidence of Trigger Finger in Surgically and Nonsurgically Managed Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to determine whether extremities undergoing carpal tunnel release (CTR) have an increased rate of trigger finger (TF) compared with conservatively managed carpal tunnel syndrome.MethodsData were collected from the Humana Insurance Database, and subjects were chosen on the basis of a history of CTR with propensity matching performed to develop a nonsurgical cohort. Following propensity matching, 16,768 patients were identified and equally split between surgical and nonsurgical treatments. Demographic information and medical comorbidities were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for the development of TF within 6 months of carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosis.ResultsPatients in the surgical cohort were more likely to develop TF than those in the nonsurgical cohort whether in the ipsilateral or contralateral extremity. Whether managed surgically or nonsurgically, extremities with carpal tunnel syndrome demonstrated an increased prevalence of TF than their contralateral, unaffected extremity.ConclusionsSurgeons should be aware of the association of TF and CTR both during the presurgical and postsurgical evaluations as they might impact patient management. With knowledge of these data, surgeons may be more attuned to detecting an early TF during the postsurgical period and offer more aggressive treatment of TF pathology during CTR.Type of study/level of evidencePrognostic III

Incidence of Trigger Finger in Surgically and Nonsurgically Managed Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether extremities undergoing carpal tunnel release (CTR) have an increased rate of trigger finger (TF) compared with conservatively managed carpal tunnel syndrome. METHODS: Data were collected from the Humana Insurance Database, and subjects were chosen on the basis of a history of CTR with propensity matching performed to develop a nonsurgical cohort. Following propensity matching, 16,768 patients were identified and equally split between surgical and nonsurgical treatments. Demographic information and medical comorbidities were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for the development of TF within 6 months of carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosis. RESULTS: Patients in the surgical cohort were more likely to develop TF than those in the nonsurgical cohort whether in the ipsilateral or contralateral extremity. Whether managed surgically or nonsurgically, extremities with carpal tunnel syndrome demonstrated an increased prevalence of TF than their contralateral, unaffected extremity. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons should be aware of the association of TF and CTR both during the presurgical and postsurgical evaluations as they might impact patient management. With knowledge of these data, surgeons may be more attuned to detecting an early TF during the postsurgical period and offer more aggressive treatment of TF pathology during CTR. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic III

Assessing Gender Differences in Technical Skills and Confidence in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Applicants.

INTRODUCTION: Variations in confidence for procedural skills have been demonstrated when comparing male and female medical students in surgical training. This study investigates whether differences in technical skill and self-reported confidence exist between male and female medical students applying to orthopaedic residency. METHODS: All medical students (2017 to 2020) invited to interview at a single orthopaedic residency program were prospectively evaluated on their technical skills and self-reported confidence. Objective evaluation of technical skill included scores for a suturing task as evaluated by faculty graders. Self-reported confidence in technical skills was assessed before and after completing the assigned task. Scores for male and female students were compared by age, self-identified race/ethnicity, number of publications at the time of application, athletic background, and US Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 score. RESULTS: Two hundred sixteen medical students were interviewed, of which 73% were male (n = 158). No gender differences were observed in suture task technical skill scores or mean difference in simultaneous visual task scores. The mean change from pre-task and post-task self-reported confidence scores was similar between sexes. Although female students trended toward lower post-task self-reported confidence scores compared with male students, this did not achieve statistical significance. Lower self-reported confidence was associated with a higher US Medical Licensing Examination score and with attending a private medical school. DISCUSSION: No difference in technical skill or confidence was found between male and female applicants to a single orthopaedic surgery residency program. Female applicants trended toward self-reporting lower confidence than male applicants in post-task evaluations. Differences in confidence have been shown previously in surgical trainees, which may suggest that differences in skill and confidence may develop during residency training

Subspecialty Rotation Exposure Across Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-Accredited Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs.

INTRODUCTION: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) mandates certain procedural minimums for graduating residents of orthopaedic surgery programs and provides residency programs with comparative data on surgical case volume. It provides much less guidance and feedback to programs regarding the amount of time residents should spend on different rotations during residency. Comparative data regarding how much time residents are spending on general and subspecialty rotations may be of use to educational leadership as they consider curriculum changes and alternative training structures. The purpose of this study is to summarize the subspecialty rotation exposure across ACGME-accredited orthopaedic residency programs and to correlate the subspecialty rotation exposure with available program-specific factors. METHODS: This study contacted 162 ACGME-accredited orthopaedic residency programs and received rotation schedules from 115 programs (70.1%). Rotation schedules for postgraduate year 2 to 5 residents were categorized into the number of months spent on the following rotations: general orthopaedics, trauma, pediatrics, hand, sport, foot and ankle, arthroplasty, oncology, spine, research, and elective. The percentage of residency spent in each category was then calculated as the number of months divided by 48 months. Differences in the percent of residency spent on subspecialty rotations were compared for the following variables: program size and presence of subspecialty fellowships at the institution. RESULTS: On average, the greatest percentage of residency spent was in the following categories: trauma (16.6%; 8.0 months), general orthopaedics (13.7%; 6.6 months), and pediatrics (12.5%; 6.0 months). Rotations with the highest variation between programs included the following: general orthopaedics (SD 5.8 months; range 0 to 30 months), sport (SD 2.5 months; range 0 to 15 months), and arthroplasty (SD 2.3 months; range 0 to 11.8 months). Sixty-seven programs (63.2%) had dedicated blocks for research, and 25 programs (23.6%) had dedicated blocks for electives. No notable correlations were found between subspecialty exposure and program size or availability of subspecialty fellowship training at the program. CONCLUSION: Variability exists between ACGME-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs in subspecialty rotation exposure. Summarizing the subspecialty rotation exposure across accredited orthopaedic residency programs is useful to graduate medical education leadership for comparative purposes because they design and modify resident curricula

Surgical Games: A Simulation-Based Structured Assessment of Orthopedic Surgery Resident Technical Skill.

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based education and objective evaluation of surgical skill have been incorporated into many surgical training programs. We describe the development and implementation of a timed, multitask, station-based Surgical Games to evaluate orthopedic resident surgical skills. METHODS: Participants in the study were postgraduate-year 2 to 5 orthopedic surgery residents from a single institution. Residents completed 4-timed simulated tasks: cadaveric carpal tunnel release (CTR), Sawbones model of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), Sawbones model of ankle fracture open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), and knee arthroscopy simulator (KAS) of removal of loose body. Evaluations were performed using standardized score sheets by attending surgeons. Resident performance was analyzed by postgraduate-year and number of weeks of prior task-related residency training. RESULTS: A total of 32 residents were assessed at the 4 stations. Total scores were significantly different for CTR (p = 0.006), TKA (p = 0.05), and the KAS (p = 0.004) by year of training, but not for the ankle ORIF task. Residents with more task-specific experience performed significantly better on the KAS (p \u3c 0.001), TKA (p = 0.002), and CTR (p = 0.02) tasks but not on the ankle ORIF task (p = 0.1). Overall, residents rated the exercise valuable to their education with mean scores of 3.9 ± 0.54 on a 5-point Likert Scale. CONCLUSIONS: This Surgical Games exercise provided an objective evaluation of surgical skill that correlated with year-in-training and prior experience in skill-specific rotations for the KAS, TKA, and CTR tasks. This surgical skills assessment provided an opportunity for effective structured feedback and identification of areas for improvement